Journalists are constantly surrounded by forces that show pragmatism. So the ongoing struggle for the people of the press as the era of independence now seems obsolete.
Considered the fourth pillar of democracy in addition to executives, legislature and judicially embody the importance of the press for a democratic country. It can be the voice of the people, the freedom funnel, and other terms attached to the press because a policy requires consideration of all.
That's what makes people's voices so much louder via press. To illustrate how a media channel becomes a fighting tool in the capture of freedom. By voicing human rights abuses... colonialism and imprealism.
The sounds of a field fact opened the eyes of all parties so the colonization must be immediately stopped. Because the state is basically present to protect the people with all the bloodshed.
![]() |
| Ilustrasi (Sumber : Pixels.com) |
But now the important facts of the press are increasingly saturated with pragmatic oligarchs. So it becomes a tool for building public preradigma to benefit of a paid group. To interfere with people's psychology and thus build paradigms is not a problem for the media.
The media can even mask the facts to their own oligarchy. Thus, journalists' profession runs counter to article 6 of the journalistic code of ethics that says "Indonesian journalists do not abuse professions and do not accept bribes."
Section 6 with the facts of the current era is like a deep roast of fire and therefore the preoccupation of press is difficult to make. Pragmatism and interest practices have made journalists present without a critical point of view because the stigma management projects only require a narrative from a political elite.
Not even a lot of people use the press as blackmail of the public officials, to fill the coffers of the rupiah. It's even more stigmatizing the profession once used as a tool of struggle.
In the present era of information transparency, the press is the tip of the spear to counterbalance the fast-moving, unfiltered flow of information.
It is not surprising that it is possible to have pragmatic journalists raising, and to be antitypical of article 6 on the journalistic ethics code. One of the struggles for democritus and volume amplification of popular voices is now called into question.
If today many executives, legislators and executives are caught even because of receiving bribes and alleged violations far from independent. One of the pillars of democracy is also too late to glean.
A number of cases of fake journalists, press journalists even involving a case as if it were an iceberg that looks very small on top and very dangerous on the bottom.
Not to mention raising pragmatic journalists who are antithetically... article 6 of the journalistic code of ethics that is hungry for wealth. It is not wrong that the current pillar of the press is crushed in capitalism, and is about to lose his fight, and make this profession an ordinary job without the privilege of a marginalized group. (***)

Post a Comment for "The press as the fourth pillar materializing into the antithesis"